Environmental Comparison of End-of-Life Options for Cotton T-Shirts
- Coop wants to understand the environmental impacts and benefits of different end-of-life options of a cotton t-shirt.
- The impacts should be compared to the overall lifecycle impact of producing a t-shirt.
- The ultimate goal is to identify efficient ways to close the loop in the apparel sector
Quantis used Swiss primary data from the project collaboration partners TEXAID, Soex and Telltex to compare four different end-oflife options for a t-shirt:
- Compared to the overall impact of the lifecycle of a t-shirt, the production and use phases have the most significant environmental impact. The end-of-life impacts (see graph on the top, e.g. Collection & Transports and Sorting & Recycling for the re-wear option) are negligible.
- The biggest positive impact of the different endof-life options are re-wear (due to the decreased production of new products) followed by down-cycling to wipers or insulation
- The positive effects of substitution of materials depend on the environmental impact of the substituted virgin materials. End-of-life measures can replace high-quality products and resources.
- Incineration and composting of cotton t-shirts are the end-of-life options with the heaviest environmental burden and should be avoided.
- Textiles transport and end-of-life processing, such as fiber recycling, wipers cutting and clothes cleaning have a low contribution to the entire lifecycle of the t-shirt (below 2% of CO2e emissions)
- Metrics-based proof points for selecting and justifying different end-of-life options
- Using results for client communications